Skip to content

FACT SHEET: Medicaid and SNAP vs. $200b for War on Iran: State-by-State Impact

The $200b the Pentagon wants for Iran would be enough to restore and expand safety net programs in every state.
Demonstrators protest health care cuts at Washington, D.C.'s Union Station. (Shutterstock)
In this report

To speak with an expert, contact IPS Deputy Communications Director Olivia Alperstein olivia@ips-dc.org. For recent press statements, visit our Press page.

We couldn’t just restore the funds cut for Medicaid. We could expand coverage.

Reports indicate that the Pentagon will soon request $200 billion for its unjust, unpopular, and illegal war on Iran.

Even one dollar of additional funding for this war is too much. Last year’s H.R. 1 — the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” — cut Medicaid and SNAP and, at the same time, added $156 billion for the Pentagon and war, bringing the Pentagon budget to more than $1 trillion for the first time since World War II. 

Now, nearly half of Americans are struggling to afford basic necessities, and the U.S. attack on Iran is pushing gas prices higher. Because of H.R. 1 and other policies, more than 14 million people are at risk of losing health insurance, and 4 million people risk losing food assistance. New and cumbersome paperwork to meet “work requirements” means that even many people eligible under the new rules are likely to lose food assistance

Instead of prolonging this war — or enabling the next one — with more funds, Americans deserve a government that supports them when times are tough. 

Instead of spending $200 billion to continue the war on Iran, the United States could:

  • Cover Medicaid for all 14 million people at risk of losing insurance, 
  • AND cover SNAP for all of the 4 million people at risk of losing food assistance, including 3.5 million due to new work requirements for older people and caregivers, 
  • AND expand Medicaid to an additional 10.3 million people. 

The cost of covering Medicaid and food assistance for those at-risk people totals $118 billion. That leaves $82 billion, enough to expand Medicaid by 10.3 million people — or to fund any other policy that would actually help people in need.

The table shows how each state’s taxpayer contribution for $200 billion could cover that state’s population at risk of losing insurance, and food assistance for the vast majority of those at risk. In 43 states and the District of Columbia, taxpayers’ share of $200 billion is more than enough to cover everyone at risk — with enough leftover to cover those at risk in every single state, and still expand programs to help people in need.

A table for congressional districts can be found here.

What every state’s share of the Pentagon’s $200 billion could cover instead

StateTaxpayer Share of $200 BillionPeople Who Could Receive Medicaid InsteadIncrease in Uninsured by 2034 due to H.R. 1, ACA Lapse, and other policiesPeople Who Could Receive SNAP InsteadPeople At Risk of Losing SNAP Under New Work Requirements for Older People & CaregiversPercent of at-risk for Medicaid AND SNAP who could be covered by state’s share of $200 billion
Alabama$1,750,000,000366,000150,000757,00061,000100% or more
Alaska$314,000,00034,00029,00085,0005,000100% or more
Arizona$3,387,000,000425,000420,0001,548,00073,00097%
Arkansas$974,000,000164,000140,000448,00025,000100% or more
California$31,219,000,0004,006,0001,700,00013,533,000368,000100% or more
Colorado$4,049,000,000614,000190,0001,811,00055,000100% or more
Connecticut$3,690,000,000418,000150,0001,613,00034,000100% or more
Delaware$601,000,00055,00046,000277,00013,000100% or more
District of Columbia$768,000,00062,00032,000330,00014,000100% or more
Florida$14,067,000,0002,843,0001,500,0006,376,000253,000100% or more
Georgia$5,043,000,0001,006,000500,0002,236,000154,000100% or more
Hawaii$658,000,000109,00042,000148,00013,000100% or more
Idaho$709,000,00097,00050,000329,0008,000100% or more
Illinois$8,498,000,0001,293,000520,0003,671,000205,000100% or more
Indiana$2,781,000,000275,000290,0001,180,00054,00091%
Iowa$1,342,000,000176,000110,000656,00023,000100% or more
Kansas$1,392,000,000146,00063,000636,00015,000100% or more
Kentucky$1,537,000,000165,000220,000793,00050,00072%
Louisiana$1,732,000,000233,000330,000769,00068,00066%
Maine$587,000,00064,00033,000277,00010,000100% or more
Maryland$4,366,000,000463,000210,0002,015,00057,000100% or more
Massachusetts$6,944,000,000646,000210,0002,947,000103,000100% or more
Michigan$4,794,000,000813,000390,0002,303,000123,000100% or more
Minnesota$3,561,000,000295,000180,0001,883,00032,000100% or more
Mississippi$774,000,00085,000110,000353,00033,00072%
Missouri$2,670,000,000285,000230,0001,155,00058,000100% or more
Montana$502,000,00075,00050,000241,0007,000100% or more
Nebraska$916,000,00094,00054,000427,0009,000100% or more
Nevada$1,648,000,000326,000110,000826,00046,000100% or more
New Hampshire$981,000,000117,00032,000488,0004,000100% or more
New Jersey$8,150,000,000872,000390,0003,492,00075,000100% or more
New Mexico$725,000,00091,00098,000318,00055,00080%
New York$17,060,000,0001,733,000860,0006,771,000317,000100% or more
North Carolina$4,821,000,000653,000450,0002,320,000142,000100% or more
North Dakota$415,000,00037,00026,000181,0003,000100% or more
Ohio$5,468,000,000693,000460,0002,380,00098,000100% or more
Oklahoma$1,425,000,000260,000180,000648,00058,000100% or more
Oregon$2,187,000,000289,000210,0001,035,00062,000100% or more
Pennsylvania$7,518,000,000670,000450,0003,514,000143,000100% or more
Rhode Island$645,000,00073,00042,000271,00010,000100% or more
South Carolina$2,071,000,000395,000190,000929,00049,000100% or more
South Dakota$395,000,00053,00020,000164,0005,000100% or more
Tennessee$3,106,000,000486,000210,0001,357,00052,000100% or more
Texas$16,179,000,0002,224,0001,400,0007,146,000275,000100% or more
Utah$1,462,000,000191,000150,000645,00012,000100% or more
Vermont$356,000,00041,00018,000159,0006,000100% or more
Virginia$5,691,000,000557,000350,0002,661,00078,000100% or more
Washington$6,177,000,000850,000430,0002,850,00057,000100% or more
West Virginia$534,000,00069,00075,000261,00034,00082%
Wisconsin$2,996,000,000410,000110,0001,546,00049,000100% or more
Wyoming$338,000,00049,0009,700173,0002,000100% or more
Total$199,973,000,00026,446,00014,219,70088,932,0003,555,000100% or more

Subscribe to our newsletter